Tag: trump

  • When Belief Becomes Performance

    When Belief Becomes Performance

    A World That Doesn’t Pause

    Many things are happening in the world that it almost feels strange to list them. War. Rising costs. Political figures collapsing under the weight of their own contradictions. Religion being used, questioned, defended, attacked. At any other point in history, events like these might have felt defining, almost like they demanded something from us like our attention.

    And yet, life goes on in a way that feels almost disconnected from it all. We wake up, go to work, meet friends, eat, sleep. The world does not seem to stop anymore, not even in the face of things that should shake it.

    Maybe it’s because everything has become a kind of war. A war on drugs. A war on disease. A war on ideas. When everything is framed as conflict, nothing feels exceptional anymore.

    Even the loss of life, something that should always feel personal, gets reduced to language like “collateral’’, “safety’’ etc.

    I am writing this appeal to you

    Do our intentions matter anymore or have we been conditioned to just give opinions.


    Why We Say Anything

    I guess before going further, I should acknowledge the obvious irony: this piece is itself an opinion. I am adding to the very noise I am questioning.

    So my intention matters here.

    I am not trying to convince anyone to think a certain way. If anything, I am trying to offer a perspective that can be challenged. A healthy debate, to me, is only as good as the arguments presented on both sides. To take a position seriously is to give it enough weight that it can stand against criticism.

    But how many opinions today are actually formed that way?

    Because there is a difference between an opinion formed to understand, and one formed to be seen.

    We have always had an element of performance in who we are. William Shakespeare captured it long before:

    They have their exits and their entrances,
    And one man in his time plays many parts,
    His acts being seven ages.’’

    William  Shakespeare

    This isn’t new, we have always played roles depending on where we are and who we are with. But something has changed. The stage has become constant. And the audience is no longer limited it is everywhere.

    I believe if Shakespeare were to write this in today’s day and age he would mention ‘His acts being eight ages’.


    Social Media: The Stage Without End

    Social media may not have created performance, but it definitely refined it.

    It rewards visibility, consistency, and alignment. It does not take long to notice that what is presented is rarely the full picture. Influencers curate versions of their lives. Public figures signal causes through symbols and statements. Even ordinary people, in smaller ways, learn what to show and what to hide.

    And it’s not always done in an obvious way, it’s subtle.

    • It’s the hesitation to express something that might be unpopular.
    • It’s the instinct to self-censor and frame a thought in a way that will be accepted.
    • It’s the quiet awareness that approval can be lost.

    So opinions now shift not always to what is true, but to what is safe.

    At the same time, the pace of everything accelerates. Our opinions are expected quickly. React now. Respond now. Take a stance before the full picture is even clear.

    We like to think that more perspectives lead to better understanding. But the reality feels different.

    The more we scroll, the less we seem to process.

    Studies on information overload suggests that constant streams of content don’t sharpen thinking they exhaust it. What we call engagement may just be cognitive strain in disguise. Instead of forming ideas, we react to them. Instead of reflecting, we respond.

    And the systems we use reinforce this, algorithms don’t show us everything, they show us what keeps us there. Familiar views, comfortable agreements, and just enough opposition to keep things interesting, but not enough to disrupt the safe space carefully curated.

    So we exist in spaces where our opinions feel validated, even when they haven’t been deeply examined.


    The Mask We Speak Through

    There’s another layer to this that feels harder to ignore.

    It’s how different we can be depending on who is watching.

    There are thoughts we share publicly, and thoughts we keep private. There are opinions we are comfortable attaching our names to, and others we would rather leave unsaid. Sometimes, the people closest to us our friends and family are the ones we don’t want seeing our online selves.

    That split is strange when you think about it.

    Oscar Wilde once wrote,

    Give a man a mask, and he will tell you the truth.”

    It’s unsettling about how well that fits.

    Social media can act as that mask. It allows for a kind of expression that is unabashed, raw and unfiltered but also detached and self-focused. Agreement turns strangers into allies. Disagreement can turn even familiar voices into opposition.

    And somewhere in that dynamic, it becomes harder to tell what is actually believed, and what is simply being performed.

    Which brings the question back to intention.

    If an opinion is shaped by audience, by pressure, by the need to belong or to be seen…what is it, really?

     And who are we really?


    What Are We Standing On?

    It also raises a deeper question about morality.

    Many of us subscribe, consciously or not, to some form of relative morality, where values shift depending on context. If that is the case, what truly anchors our decisions?

    If opinions are constantly changing, influenced by environment and feedback, are we standing on anything stable at all?

    Or are we building our worldview on something closer to shifting sand that is only as steady as long as nothing challenges it too directly?

    Without intention, without reflection, it becomes difficult to tell the difference between what we believe and what we have performed to absolve ourselves from the burden of considered thought.


    What Remains

    It feels strange to arrive at a conclusion here, because this is not something that resolves cleanly. This piece itself could be dismissed as just another opinion. And maybe that’s fair. Maybe it proves the point. But there is something that feels worth holding onto.

    We don’t merely have opinions anymore, we have deadlines for them.

    And that changes the nature of how they are formed.

    It makes the world feel faster, louder, and in some ways, less certain. Because while we can learn to recognise patterns in nature, like the way the sea behaves before a storm, the signs of a rope being frayed, we never fully know the true intentions of man.

    And if intention is what gives an opinion its weight, then losing sight of it matters more than we realise.

    Maybe that is not for us to fully know. Maybe that sits somewhere beyond us, between people, and whoever is left to judge it.

  • A New Year’s Reflection: One Step at a Time

    A New Year’s Reflection: One Step at a Time

    Another year has passed and with it come the opportunity of starting our new year’s resolutions and working towards fresh goals. I love the idea of starting a new; be it a new month or even phase of our life. It portrays something that is often missing in our daily news or even in our daily conversations, Hope.

    While we cannot ignore the conditions of a troubled world, be it economic turmoil, geopolitical tensions, wars and famine. These challenges have been with us in varying degrees for as long as history has been recorded. We see them unfolding, but often it feels like nothing improves at least to the naked eye, sometimes giving the sense that there is no point continuing with the charade of everything being fine.

    But with the new year while new troubles may arise, new opportunities also extend their hands to us.

    I find it fitting that after the month of Christmas, the season of Love, Hope and Peace we enter the new year. It’s a reminder for us to carry those values into the new year. Christmas shows us that love means sacrifice, that hope can be found even in a humble manger and that peace is something we can all strive towards in interactions with the world around us.

    It’s not always easy. Personally, when I am slighted, my instinct is to defend myself, but I’ve learnt that taking a moment to pause before reaction helps a ton in clearing the mind. Small steps like this are part of why I enjoy entering the new year, even if we enter with simple resolutions like spending less time (5 mins or even 1 hour) on the mobile. Even that small change is progress.

    Often, when we look toward moving forward, we want progress to come quickly and results to appear instantly. But taking intentional steps in the present makes looking back at the path we’ve created all the more rewarding.

    Imagine walking on a sandy beach in haste, then walking on it with intention, taking in the ocean and life around you. Which set of footprints would be more striking?

    In The Screwtape Letters, a witty book by C.S Lewis that features two demons, Wormwood and Screwtape, exchanging letters on the best way to corrupt a soul, there is a salient quote from Screwtape. ‘For the Present is the point at which time touches eternity.’

    Many times, I forget the blessing that is the present day in search for something I may not find tomorrow or something that I may not need in search of my own greed and ambition.

    If there’s one thing to take away from this post, it’s this:

    Before the sun reaches its peak in the sky, it passes through the beauty of the sunrise, where not on the sun itself but everything the light touches, is admired. In the same way, living intentionally in each present moment can help us see both the world and ourselves more clearly.

  • Correction vs. Conviction: The Outer Push, the Inner Pull

    Correction vs. Conviction: The Outer Push, the Inner Pull

    In today’s world, there are many discussions on rehabilitating people when they are radicalised or commit crimes. It led me to a question on what are the steps that one usually has to go through before rehabilitation is possible. I landed at two words, ‘Correction’ and ‘Conviction’.

    Before we get started let’s explore what each of these words mean:

    Corrections: Change that rectifies an error or inaccuracy or the action or process of correcting something.

    Conviction: A formal declaration by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law that someone is guilty of a criminal offence or a firmly held belief or opinion.

    From the simplified definitions (thank you Google!) we can perceive the difference between the words. Correction is more of an external manifestation on making amends to ensure better performance or in some cases acceptable behaviour.

    Correction is important in helping us learn, grow and improve across our personal and professional lives. In a way, when one accepts correction, it may lead to increase self-worth and confidence, because it’s a reminder that no one is perfect.

    Conviction on the other hand, is more intrinsic. It provides internal strength to pursue our goals, overcome obstacles and maintain congruence in thought and action. Leading to greater personal growth and even building resilience. Strong convictions help to inspire trust in others, strengthen decision making and foster a sense of purpose and passion. It makes setbacks and obstacles no matter how daunting seem small when one is convicted in their belief or action.

    When I was writing this I realised that one is clearly more powerful than the other. If you are corrected or chastised, you may not always be convicted of your actions or behaviour. But if you are convicted on something, it comes hand in hand with being chastised or corrected which then shapes how you continue to journey through life.

    So where does this difference show up most clearly? I’ve noticed it in two very different groups: children and criminals. Both are often corrected, but the presence—or absence—of conviction makes all the difference.

    Children and Criminals: What is the difference?

    I know the header seems abit jarring but bear with me.

    Many of my close friends and family work with children. I always found it curious when I would see them correcting a child, it usually goes with (a) Shout or yelling to get their attention, (b) being pulled aside, (c) telling the child what they did was wrong and sometimes if you are lucky (d) Why it was wrong. Many times, as adults we stop at telling children ‘what’ but rarely go beyond to ‘why’.

    Maybe its because we assume that a young child would not understand the why, so we don’t bother telling them that till they’re older.

    But when will a child be old enough?

    The question I have lies more with the adults, why do we stop and not explain to children why their behaviour is bad, disruptive, rude (any of the above). While yes, I do think we should pick our battles, for a young child even putting out the ‘why’ makes a difference because it’s planting seeds into their minds and can make changes to their behaviour.

    Many times, as adults we get upset when we receive an apology that does not put into words ‘why’ we are receiving it.

    Case in point, pick which one you prefer:

    ‘I’m sorry for saying that, please forgive me’

    vs

    ‘I’m sorry for calling you that. It was hurtful and childish thing to do. I was being rude and inconsiderate for even using that term, I will do better, please forgive me’.

    The difference in an apology is the understanding of why. It is not simply the word ‘sorry’ that makes the difference.

    If as adults many of us struggle with accepting such apologies or lack of reasoning, why are we leaving children unequipped.


    Now for criminals we have the opposite problem.

    Many times, they are aware of social norms and rules on criminal activities. In a courtroom their crimes are detailed and explained to the jury or the judge and it is always presented with a motive (the why) in the courtroom.

    Playing devil advocate to myself, if the ‘why’ is needed—this is the perfect scenario— why are there repeat offenders occur. Its confusing especially when the consequences have been outlined and experienced.

    I like to think that despite the judge or jury passing a conviction, internally the person isn’t convicted. Ever heard the saying ‘you can bring the horse to water, but you can’t make it drink’. Well, this is the same.

    The beauty of conviction is that it is a double-edged sword. It is more effective than correction only when it is from within. Which means if I choose to justify my behaviour due to other external factors rather than accept that I had to power to choose my decision despite the circumstance, I will never be convicted.

    I can be corrected by people, I can explain and justify my actions, but I won’t be able to see the hurt or pain it caused, and neither will I be willing to accept that I became a perpetrator unless I am convicted.


    How do we continue evolving

    I know it’s an uncomfortable conversation to slowly peel yourself open to the possibility that there are a lot of things in life that makes you a cog in the machine and the same way the cog does not understand why you just go through the motions.

    But maybe the question isn’t which is more powerful, but how we can move from correction to conviction in our own lives. The next time we are corrected—whether as children, adults, or even in the quiet courtroom of our conscience—what if we paused long enough to ask: Do I just understand what I did wrong, or am I convicted enough to live differently?

    The answer may determine whether the lesson ends there.