Tag: idolatry

  • How Freedom Meets Responsibility

    How Freedom Meets Responsibility

    As the year comes to an end, I wanted to discuss something I realised has become a symbiotic relationship the more interconnected we have become as a society. It is the relationship between individual freedom and social responsibility.


    Freedom vs. Responsibility

    This raises a big question: when does social responsibility encroach on individual freedom and should it?

    Individual freedom is the right to make choices without undue restraint, as long as others’ freedoms are respected. Social responsibility, on the other hand, is the ethical duty to act for the greater good — whether that’s businesses providing recycling bins, or individuals choosing to recycle.

    In a society where responsibility is shared, collaboration feels natural. But when it’s unevenly applied — like individuals being fined for littering but companies dumping trash into rivers— it can feel more like coercion than collaboration.

    Can we call society “fair” if responsibility is imposed on a few while others remain exempt?

    Let’s look at it from 2 different perspectives Libertarian and Utilitarian


    The Libertarian Perspective: Freedom First

    From a libertarian viewpoint, individual freedom is the ultimate value. Libertarians argue that the right to personal liberty should take precedence over societal demands for collective behavior. After all, freedom means having the ability to make personal choices—whether those choices are popular or not.

    In this view, social responsibility cannot justify infringing on personal freedoms. Even when public opinion pushes for conformity—be it the latest social trend, political correctness, or collective activism—libertarians would argue that individuals should have the right to opt out without facing judgment or consequence.

    The Utilitarian Perspective: The Greater Good

    On the other hand, utilitarianism puts the common good at the center. According to this philosophy, actions should be evaluated based on their consequences for society as a whole. In this view, individual freedoms might need to be curtailed if it’s for the benefit of the larger community.

    For example, in the context of environmental responsibility, the utilitarian argument might support limiting personal freedoms (like car ownership or meat consumption) if these sacrifices can help reduce climate change and promote long-term societal well-being.

    (Which is ironic when you realise that larger corporations curbing their carbon emissions would be more effective than a single person recycling…I still do recycle but you have to admit it is funny)


    The Clash in Modern Society

    Today, this tension is more visible than ever. Social media amplifies the need for individual freedom and also social responsibility, where likes and shares often validate ideas and lifestyles.

    Protests, for instance, while they are a critical part of social change, they can also lead to unintended consequences. When protesters block roads, destroy property, or disrupt people’s livelihoods, the people most affected are often the ones who may already be struggling to make ends meet—like delivery drivers, small business owners, or workers trying to earn a living.

    Recently in Melbourne, rocks were hurled at police officers who were doing their jobs in trying to maintain peace and order for citizens going about their day and also respecting individuals rights to protest and counter protest one another.

    The irony is that the actions of these protestors might turn more people away from their message than towards it. As we know the road to hell is paved with good intention. It ends up creating a situation where the solution to one problem ends up exacerbating the suffering of others who are just trying to survive, which can feel like an unfair trade-off

    Why should my personal liberties be curtailed due to your ‘view’ on what social responsibility should look like?

    This is where the clash occurs: how do we balance the desire to foster a sense of social responsibility while still respecting personal freedoms?


    Finding a Middle Ground

    Ultimately, the goal should be to find a balance—encouraging people to make responsible, ethical choices. But also respecting people who are doing their jobs and trying to make the best out of the hand they’ve been dealt. As humans we are complicated which results in us making processes equally complicated —somehow I doubt we will ever find the perfect solution.

    But to come close to one, people should be empowered to make decisions for the common good, but not at the expense of their right to think, speak, and live freely.


    Food for Thought

    In an age where societal pressures often dictate how we live and what we believe, it’s important to acknowledge the fine line between social responsibility and individual freedom. While we all have a role to play in creating a better society, we must also protect the freedoms that allow us to live authentically, express diverse opinions, challenge norms.

    Because only when freedom and responsibility walk hand in hand, will we thrive.

  • The Silent Weapon

    The Silent Weapon

    In today’s world a moment of silence is hard to come by. Be it background noise of the TV or constant notifications from friends or family [on our devices]. Silence has become a foreign concept to us. Even our vocabulary has changed around the concept of silence, terms like Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) and hustling are indication that we need to always be on the move or involved in something. If we are not, something is wrong.

    It is important to take note that silence is not merely the absence of noise, it’s also the control and silencing of your own inner voice and thoughts. Imagine tethering a kite to a tree and letting it blow in the wind. When I think of silence I think of that scene, there is still movement, there is still colour there is still life, but it is grounded in something firm and unshakable.

    It is where we reflect on our lives, thoughts, plans and emotions. It is also sometimes what we need to make the right choices.

    As someone who spends a lot of time in silence, for better or worse, I don’t fear it, but I treat it like a mentor that guides me. And it seems that many philosophers in the past have had similar thoughts:

    Friedrich Nietzsche, wrote,

    Nietzsche implies that true power comes from self-mastery over one’s words and thoughts. It is a space for one to practice their own strength. For Nietzsche, silence represents a break from the dictatorship of language, an opportunity for one to learn when to speak and when to remain silent. To study the world without placing oneself as distraction.

    Similarly, the philosopher Simone Weil wrote

    ‘Our soul makes constant noise, but it has a silent place we never hear’.

    For Weil, in the search for the divine the only place we can find it is in our silence. It is the only time God will not be interrupted in speaking with us because our distractions are put at bay.

    Many times, when we cry silent tears, it holds more emotions and truth then whatever words we can muster up to speak. The purity of silence is that it allows for a free expression that would only ever be limited by words.


    Silence is not Weakness

    One of the most intriguing aspects of silence is how often it is categorised as weakness. If someone does not retort back to defend themselves or to engage in conversations that are untrue, they are seen as being complicit. But they are far from it, they are disengaging from the noise in the world. Sometimes in being well-meaning to find answers, I wonder if we are just giving people the opportunity to justify their actions with inadequate words and resounding noise, that it deafens our moral compass.

    The idea that actions speak louder than words is a phrase we use often but hardly practice.

    Zeno of Citium, shares how silence is a way to prevent yourself from becoming a fool. He writes that

    ‘It is better to trip with the feet than the tongue’.

    His understanding in how many of the world’s fights, wars are aggravated by the tongue, a splash of anger, words and actions that do not think or consider its repercussions.

    Similarly, Jean Paul Sarte recognises that silence has power:

    ‘Every word has consequences. Every silence, too.’

    Silence acts as a signal to others on your stance and position.

    From the perspective of free speech, people should be allowed to say whatever they want, and while free speech is a way one can freely express themselves remaining silent is another less taken path that people can also choose to express themselves freely.

    While it may not be as flashy as speaking your mind, it does hold more wisdom.

     In choosing silence, people can reject overwhelming expectations placed on them by society, or their peers. Silence becomes a deliberate refusal to conform to a world that expects constant output and response.


    Silence as a path to Self

    The idea of silence as an introspective practice is not new. Many Eastern philosophies, especially those found in Buddhism and Hinduism, place great emphasis on the power of silence for self-realization. The practice of meditation has been seen to embrace silence and cultivate inner awareness to achieve enlightenment.

    In the words of Rabbi Akavia

    Silence is a fence around wisdom.

    It often suggests that silence is a protective barrier, preserving wisdom by controlling impulsive speech and allowing time for deeper thought and learning.

    In the end silence helps prevent mistakes, protects the purity and authenticity of wisdom, and allows for the observation and understanding of others. It fosters one’s own growth and thoughtful decision-making.


    A Moment of Silence

    There is a reason when someone passes we are asked to remain silent. Silence brings out the introspective quality of life that we are missing today. I hope after reading this, you will learn to embrace a moment of silence, be it in grabbing a drink alone or sitting at the park bench admiring the sky.

    Find the time to be silent.

    As the poet T.S. Eliot wisely noted, “The greatest proof of silence is the ability to hear it.” In silence, we can find the answers, in what is left unsaid.

  • Reporting for Duty: The Superman Story in Between the Lines

    Reporting for Duty: The Superman Story in Between the Lines

    I have a few thoughts on the James Gunn, Superman movie.

    Who is Superman

    Before we begin, let’s first understand who is Superman. Superman aka Kal-El, was born on Krypton. His biological parents Jor-El and Lara sent him to earth shortly before Krypton was destroyed. His ship landed in the American countryside of Smallville, Kansas, where he was found and adopted by farmers Jonathan and Martha Kent, who named him Clark Kent.

    The Kents realized he was superhuman; due to the Earth’s yellow sun, all of his physical and sensory abilities are far beyond those of a human. Growing up his adoptive parents instilled in him strong morals, he chooses to use his powers to benefit humanity, and fights crime as a vigilante.

    To protect his personal life, he changes into a primary-colored costume and uses the alias “Superman”. Clark resides in Metropolis, and works as a journalist for the Daily Planet.

    [Thank you Wikipedia!]


    His Identity

    The earliest scenes of the movie begins with him interacting with videos of his biological parents and how he finds it soothing. It helps to inform him on his role on earth as a protector. In a way, its not just informing him but also affirming his actions.

    In fact, his biological parents words govern the actions he takes in the movie. Many times we also look to our loved ones as guiding pillars on our morals, ideas and even how to act. We are shaped not just by our own thoughts but also by how others view us.

    In the movie, these words give Superman his meaning. So when it is suspected that there was more to the story and advice provided by his biological parents, Superman (understandably)does not take it well. His whole world is shifted and turned upside down and whatever he thought he knew or who he was ends up turning into a lie.

    But while it bogs Superman down for a while, it acts as a catalyst for him to question what his beliefs, intentions and actions. It pushed him to find out who he was without the noise and words from his biological parents.

    His relationship with his adoptive parents and conversation with his father help him in finding his own path despite what other might say. In fact, the beauty of the movie is the lack of correction from the characters. It doesn’t matter what is being said anymore but only what is being done.


    Lois Lane as an Anchor

    When we see his interaction with Lois Lane we see another side to their dynamic that I enjoyed. Many times Lois Lane is presented as the no nonsense reporter but never with Clark/Superman as the subject.

    But the tables turn, when we see Clark allow himself to be interviewed by her in an act of trust. We see how both of their morals and integrity as journalists and heroes play out. Bringing across an interesting but much needed dynamic. When we want to better ourselves, we need to be challenged. I believe that the reason why Lois and Clark in this film are a believable couple is because of this challenge, and to see it play out in a trusting and vulnerable way gave insight into their dynamic. We know Lois trusts him but she also takes her role as a journalist seriously especially with the backdrop of the movie.

    Unlike Lex Luthor who views Superman as a being to be controlled and destroyed because of his infallible power. Lois challenges Clark/Superman to defend his choices and in a way unearth any uncertainties regarding them. It pushes him to see that people may not see his actions in the same vein.

    The Journalism Aspect

    The fact that Superman and many of his peers are reporters adds an intriguing layer to the story. At its core, the role of a good reporter is to seek the truth and carefully examine sources. Clark initially believes he already knows the truth and trusts his own intentions, but when his world is turned upside down, he’s forced to reevaluate what he truly believes and uncover what’s really happening.

    Similarly, Lois recognizes that the situation is far more complex than the media portrays it, and her trust in Clark/Superman drives her to dig deeper. In this way, journalism, and the shared commitment to truth, becomes a powerful force that connects them, pushing both to pursue their quests for understanding despite starting from different perspectives.


    I Guess That’s The Real Punk Rock

    I really enjoyed the movie and aimed to keep this spoiler-free, but I think beyond how the movie showed that Kindness can be a superpower these areas and themes stood out to me the most. I appreciated how the story wrapped up this dynamic in a way that stayed true to the characters and provided extra nuances and layers without compromising either.